page_banner

News

Polyurethane Sealants vs. Silicone: Which Is Right for You?

Choosing the right sealant is one of the most crucial decisions affecting the long-term performance of construction, industrial assembly, and façade engineering projects. Sealants directly influence:

  • --Joint durability

  • --Water and air tightness

  • --Structural safety

  • --Aesthetic quality

  • --Maintenance cycles

  • --Lifecycle cost

As a global manufacturer specializing in silicone sealants, polyurethane (PU) sealants, PU adhesive systems, and construction waterproofing solutions, Siway provides both chemistries and understands their strengths and limitations from a material-science, engineering, and application-based perspective.

This guide provides the most comprehensive and authoritative comparison of PU vs. silicone—supported by ASTM/ISO evaluation methods, laboratory testing principles, and real-world application insights from Siway’s production and customer experience.

1. Material Chemistry & Structural Behavior

1.1 Polyurethane Sealants (Organic Polymer Chemistry)

Polyurethane (PU) sealants are based on the reaction between polyols and isocyanates, forming a cross-linked organic elastomer. This structure gives PU sealants:

Polyurethane Sealants (Organic Polymer Chemistry)

  • --High tear resistance

  • --Strong adhesion to porous substrates

  • --Superior abrasion resistance

  • --Excellent mechanical performance

PU sealants form durable elastomeric bonds ideal for:

  • --Concrete joints

  • --Structural movement joints

  • --Industrial assembly

  • --Heavy-duty flooring

  • --Perimeter sealing with mechanical stress

Their organic backbone makes them susceptible to UV degradation over long periods unless specially modified—this is why professional-grade PU products require UV stabilizers, antioxidants, and protective coating compatibility.

1.2 Silicone Sealants (Inorganic Polymer Chemistry)

Silicone sealants are based on polysiloxane chains (Si–O–Si), an inorganic backbone providing unmatched:

Silicone Sealants (Inorganic Polymer Chemistry)

  • --UV stability

  • --Thermal stability

  • --Weather resistance

  • --Hydrophobicity

  • --Long-term elasticity

The Si–O bond’s energy (~444 kJ/mol) is significantly higher than C–C or C–O bonds in organic materials, making silicones the top choice for:

  • --Curtain wall structural glazing

  • --High-performance façade joints

  • --Glass-to-metal or glass-to-glass adhesion

  • --Weatherproofing exposed exterior joints

Silicone sealants remain flexible for decades with minimal mechanical degradation.

2.Performance Comparison With Industry-Standard Testing Data

Below is a high-authority table based on typical values obtained through ASTM C920, ASTM C1184, ISO 11600, and other international standards.

2.1 Comparative Performance Table

Performance Index Polyurethane Sealant Silicone Sealant
Chemical Backbone Organic (PU elastomer) Inorganic (polysiloxane)
Typical Movement Rating ±25% (PU-25), up to ±35% ±50% (Silicone 50), structural silicones ±100%
Tensile Strength 1.0–2.0 MPa (ASTM D412) 0.7–1.5 MPa
Elongation at Break 300–600% 400–800%
UV Resistance Moderate Excellent (inorganic backbone)
Service Temperature -40°C to +90°C -50°C to +150°C
Curing Mechanism Moisture-cure Moisture-cure (neutral or acetoxy)
Shore A Hardness 25–50 20–35
Tear Resistance Very High Moderate
Paintability Yes No
Abrasion Resistance Excellent Moderate
Water Resistance Excellent Excellent
Expected Service Life 10–20 years 20–30+ years

3.Polyurethane&Silicone Sealants Engineering Strengths & Weaknesses

3.1 Advantages of Polyurethane Sealants

  • --Superior bonding to concrete, masonry, cement mortar

  • --High mechanical strength and tear resistance

  • --Suitable for dynamic or load-bearing joints

  • --Fully paintable for façade color matching

  • --Resistant to fuel, grease, and mechanical abrasion

  • --Ideal for floors, expansion joints, and industrial manufacturing

  • --Compatible with many construction materials without primer

3.2 Limitations of Polyurethane Sealants

  • --Lower UV resistance than silicone

  • --Potential yellowing under long-term exposure

  • --Shorter overall lifespan

  • --May require more surface preparation

3.1.Advantages of Polyurethane Sealants
Limitations of Polyurethane Sealants

3.3 Advantages of Silicone Sealants

  • --Unmatched UV, ozone, and atmospheric resistance

  • --Longest lifespan among sealant chemistries

  • --Strong adhesion to glass, metal, aluminum, and nonporous materials

  • --Excellent temperature stability

  • --Ideal for curtain wall structural bonding

  • --Neutral-cure silicones minimize substrate corrosion

3.4 Limitations of Silicone Sealants

  • --Not paintable

  • --Not suitable for heavy abrasion or foot traffic

  • --Sometimes requires primer on porous materials

  • --Higher initial cost

Advantages of Silicone Sealants
Limitations of Silicone Sealants

4.Polyurethane&Silicone Sealants Application Recommendations

4.1 Best Applications for Silicone Sealants

  • --Structural glazing (ASTM C1184 compliant)

  • --Curtain wall glass bonding

  • --Weatherproofing around windows, façades, and metal frames

  • --Outdoor structures exposed to direct sunlight

  • --High-temperature environments (industrial or exterior)

Suitable Siway Products

4.2 Best Applications for Polyurethane Sealants

  • --Concrete expansion and contraction joints

  • --Façade perimeter joints (non-glass portions)

  • --Floor joints, parking structures, garages

  • --Mechanical joints with impact or vibration

  • --Metal roof sealing

  • --Wood, concrete, and porous materials

Suitable Siway Products

Best Applications for Silicone Sealants
Best Applications for Polyurethane Sealants

5.Testing Standards Explained

Siway’s laboratory evaluates sealants according to:

5.1 ASTM C920 (PU & Silicone)

Tests:

  • --Adhesion/cohesion under cyclic movement

  • --Extension capability

  • --Hardness

  • --Aging resistance

  • --Water immersion

  • --Freeze-thaw stability

5.2 ASTM C1184 (Structural Silicone)

Tests:

  • --Tensile adhesion

  • --Strength degradation under UV exposure

  • --Movement resistance

  • --Structural bonding reliability

5.3 ISO 11600

Classifies sealants into:

  • --F (Façade) Class 12.5/25

  • --G (Glazing) Class 20/25/50/100

Silicone commonly meets Class 50/100, while PU meets Class 25.

ASTM C920 (PU & Silicone)
ASTM C1184 (Structural Silicone)

6.Cost, Durability & Lifecycle Evaluation

Factor PU Silicone
Initial Cost Moderate Higher
Service Life 10–20 yrs 20–30+ yrs
Maintenance Needs Medium Low
UV Exposure Suitability Medium Excellent
Heavy Traffic Suitability Excellent Poor/Moderate
Overall Lifecycle Cost Medium Low for façade systems

Silicone is ideal for long-term façade applications, while PU is ideal for mechanical and structural joints.

7.Siway Expert Recommendation

Choose Polyurethane Sealants if your project requires:

✔ Strong adhesion to concrete or porous surfaces

✔ Paintability for architectural finishes

✔ High abrasion and impact resistance

✔ Heavy-duty floor joint performance

Choose Silicone Sealants if your project requires:

✔ Extreme weather and UV resistance

✔ Structural glazing reliability

✔ Long-term flexibility

✔ Minimal maintenance

8.Why Global Customers Choose Siway

Siway is not only a manufacturer—we are a global engineering partner for façade systems, structural glazing, construction materials, and industrial assembly. Engineers, contractors, and Fortune 500 companies choose Siway because we offer:

8.1 Full Product Ecosystem (Silicone + Polyurethane + Hybrid Technologies)

Unlike single-category suppliers, Siway produces both PU and silicone, allowing us to recommend the best solution rather than pushing one product type.

8.2 Internationally Compliant Quality System

  • --ISO 9001 quality management

  • --ISO 14001 environmental management

  • --Comprehensive raw material inspection

  • --Batch consistency testing

  • --Full traceability from batch to project

8.3 Advanced R&D and Custom Formulation

Siway operates multiple research labs specializing in:

  • --Polymer material engineering

  • --Structural bonding tests

  • --Rheological analysis

  • --Accelerated aging simulation

  • --Custom formula development

We provide design-based customization, sample-based customization, and OEM manufacturing for well-known global brands.

8.4 Rigorous Supplier Assessment & Responsible Sourcing

Our raw materials come only from certified suppliers with:

  • --Environmental compliance

  • --REACH/ROHS compatibility

  • --Long-term performance records

8.5 On-Site Technical Support & Project Consulting

Siway’s technical team supports customers with:

  • --Joint design consultation

  • --Structural bonding evaluation

  • --ASTM/ISO test interpretation

  • --Compatibility testing

  • --On-site construction guidance

8.6 Production Capacity & Consistency

With modern automated production lines, Siway ensures:

  • --Stable quality

  • --High-volume supply

  • --Fast delivery worldwide

8.7 Proven Track Record with Large-Scale Projects

Siway sealants are used in:

  • --Curtain walls

  • --Airports

  • --Subway systems

  • --Industrial production lines

  • --High-rise commercial buildings

Customers repeatedly choose Siway for our reliability, material science expertise, and long-term product stability.

PU and silicone sealants are not competitors—they are engineering tools, each designed for specific performance criteria. With decades of expertise, Siway helps global customers choose the correct chemistry based on:

  • --Joint movement

  • --Substrate type

  • --Mechanical stress

  • --UV exposure

  • --Thermal cycling

  • --Installation environment

  • --Lifespan expectations

For complex projects, Siway engineers provide full technical support to ensure optimal material selection and long-term durability.

sealant supplier
Post time: Nov-26-2025
Hit enter to search or ESC to close